Jason Carr lived in a house next door to his parent’s house in Gulfport, Mississippi. He married his high school sweetheart, Katie, and together they were starting a family. On August 29, 2005, Katie drove Jason’s parents and their 4 year old daughter Sherrie (pin curls and all) to a neighboring town north of them to visit some relatives. That was the day the Hurricane Katrina hit the mainlands of America.
The hurricane chose Jason’s small town of Gulfport, Mississippi to first hit land and seemingly brought the Gulf of Mexico with it.
When I visited Jason and his family, Jason shared what exactly happened to his house when the storm came. Water began to flood his neighborhood, and then started to fill his house. He was trapped inside his house and found only one open window that he could climb out of just before being overtaken by the water inside his home. Jason must have swum and floated for over an hour before he could find land that was not covered by the flood. Thank goodness his family came out of this alive. Their house was another story.
I joined forces with a church group and was able to help Jason and his parents rebuild their homes. During that trip, I found that there was so much more to do in that area and that it will easily take a decade to rebuild the areas affected by that hurricane.
One of the best memories that I have from that trip is seeing the tears of joy in Katie’s eyes when she saw the archway that she asked me to build. Katie said, “My baby will finally be able to enjoy Christmas morning in our own home, I don’t know how to begin to thank you.” Everyone in our group took part in building the arch and it became an iconic symbol of service back to the community.
An archway of service that spans the gap that we all need to help fill is available to you too. Help families like Jason and Katie’s – without costing you a dime.
Lane Architecture + Design, P.C. is offering our clients an opportunity to give a tax deductible donation to help the families who lost their homes during the Hurricane Katrina disaster. We know that it has been almost 3 years since this monster wave came crashing into Gulfport, Mississippi and then wiped out much around New Orleans. But, the area is still in need of our help today.
We will donate up to $300 in our client’s name for every client that begins a new project with us before August 29, 2008 (exactly 3 years after the devastating day of Hurricane Katrina). Call us at 212-594-2007 to learn more about this opportunity and to begin rebuilding another family’s home who needs desperately needs their home back while having your architectural needs fulfilled at the same time. We all gain when we give.
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Monday, May 19, 2008
Pick you team wisely
This a story to illustrate how you can save money and time.
Our office got a call a few months ago from a general contractor (GC). He was referred to us from another subcontractor that we worked with on another project. He was a friend of our client-to-be and needed our office to draw up the plans of a small renovation that the client asked him to build. Although it is not uncommon that we get referrals this way, it is still the wrong way to find an architect. It is not different than getting the cart before the horse. There are several reasons that this is not the best way to pick your team. One reason is because the GC will never be able to get permits for the renovation work before receiving the approved application for the building permit that cannot be obtained without a set of drawings signed and sealed by an architect (or an engineer). Another reason is because the client is locked into using a GC at their possibly inflated cost because they did not have 3 or 4 GC’s bid the job.
During our first meeting with the GC and the client, we learned that the GC was unfamiliar with the process that he should already know in order to obtain permits in NYC. One major item that was missing was the GC’s tracking number. (Call us to explain a tracking number at 212-594-2007 if you need to know. Hint – it is a number that the New York City Department of Buildings “DOB” issues when they are removed from almost all liabilities).
Throughout the design process, our office “coached” the GC along the way to get his tracking number. We also referred him to other people that could obtain it for him. It would be good for this GC to do the work because they already have the client's trust and because it would be difficult to convince any GC in our roladex to bid this project since it is so small in scope.
After the application for the construction permit has been approved and it is now time for the GC to use his tracking number to “pull” the permits and get starting with the construction, our office got a call from the client saying that they have “contractor problems” because the GC still does not have a tracking number. Now they are asking us to offer names of other GC’s (with tracking numbers) so the construction does not need to be delayed any longer. The process of finding a GC to build this small project, walking them through the site, waiting for their bids to be returned, analyze the bids, make recommendations to the client, and choosing the GC will take at least 3 more weeks. This would not have happened if the client did not start choosing their GC and then the rest of their team at the beginning.
Moral of this story, find your architect first, let the architect help you find 3 or 4 GC’s earlier in the process to bid the job while the architect’s drawings are being reviewed for a building permit – not afterwards. You will save a lot of time and money.
Our office got a call a few months ago from a general contractor (GC). He was referred to us from another subcontractor that we worked with on another project. He was a friend of our client-to-be and needed our office to draw up the plans of a small renovation that the client asked him to build. Although it is not uncommon that we get referrals this way, it is still the wrong way to find an architect. It is not different than getting the cart before the horse. There are several reasons that this is not the best way to pick your team. One reason is because the GC will never be able to get permits for the renovation work before receiving the approved application for the building permit that cannot be obtained without a set of drawings signed and sealed by an architect (or an engineer). Another reason is because the client is locked into using a GC at their possibly inflated cost because they did not have 3 or 4 GC’s bid the job.
During our first meeting with the GC and the client, we learned that the GC was unfamiliar with the process that he should already know in order to obtain permits in NYC. One major item that was missing was the GC’s tracking number. (Call us to explain a tracking number at 212-594-2007 if you need to know. Hint – it is a number that the New York City Department of Buildings “DOB” issues when they are removed from almost all liabilities).
Throughout the design process, our office “coached” the GC along the way to get his tracking number. We also referred him to other people that could obtain it for him. It would be good for this GC to do the work because they already have the client's trust and because it would be difficult to convince any GC in our roladex to bid this project since it is so small in scope.
After the application for the construction permit has been approved and it is now time for the GC to use his tracking number to “pull” the permits and get starting with the construction, our office got a call from the client saying that they have “contractor problems” because the GC still does not have a tracking number. Now they are asking us to offer names of other GC’s (with tracking numbers) so the construction does not need to be delayed any longer. The process of finding a GC to build this small project, walking them through the site, waiting for their bids to be returned, analyze the bids, make recommendations to the client, and choosing the GC will take at least 3 more weeks. This would not have happened if the client did not start choosing their GC and then the rest of their team at the beginning.
Moral of this story, find your architect first, let the architect help you find 3 or 4 GC’s earlier in the process to bid the job while the architect’s drawings are being reviewed for a building permit – not afterwards. You will save a lot of time and money.
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
The Secrets to a Succesful Green Office Buildng Exposed by Termites
Since our focus today is on the earth and we are officially celebrating "Earth Day," I wanted to share how others are using nature to learn how to be more eco-friendly....
There is an office building in Harare, Zimbabwe named the Eastgate Centre that uses less than 10% of the energy of a conventional office builidng. This helps the management of the building save $3.5 million a year. It does this because it was designed and built to function like Termite mounds.
Evidently, termites survive only if the inside of their homes maintains a constant 87 degrees F. For many professionals, it would be quite a challenge to design a sustainable building to maintain this constant temperature while the outside temperature fluxuates from a frigid 35 degrees F at night to a blistering 104 degrees during the day. But, the termites have it all figured out by using openings at the bottom of their mounds that can be opened or closed to maintain the flow of air that is directed through their living areas and expelled up through the top of the mount.
In order to acheive this in the office building (but with cooler indoor temperatures), the architect and engineer designed the building with fans at the first floor that continuously draws air inside the building. The air is directed up through ducts that supply the fresh air into the spaces of each floor. Then, the air is exhausted through ports in the ceilings of each floor.
So, next time you see a bug that seems like a unwanted pest, consider how we might learn from them and they might actually become a desired guest. (Unless they are eating your picnic lunch).
There is an office building in Harare, Zimbabwe named the Eastgate Centre that uses less than 10% of the energy of a conventional office builidng. This helps the management of the building save $3.5 million a year. It does this because it was designed and built to function like Termite mounds.
Evidently, termites survive only if the inside of their homes maintains a constant 87 degrees F. For many professionals, it would be quite a challenge to design a sustainable building to maintain this constant temperature while the outside temperature fluxuates from a frigid 35 degrees F at night to a blistering 104 degrees during the day. But, the termites have it all figured out by using openings at the bottom of their mounds that can be opened or closed to maintain the flow of air that is directed through their living areas and expelled up through the top of the mount.
In order to acheive this in the office building (but with cooler indoor temperatures), the architect and engineer designed the building with fans at the first floor that continuously draws air inside the building. The air is directed up through ducts that supply the fresh air into the spaces of each floor. Then, the air is exhausted through ports in the ceilings of each floor.
So, next time you see a bug that seems like a unwanted pest, consider how we might learn from them and they might actually become a desired guest. (Unless they are eating your picnic lunch).
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Ground Zero Not in Additional Danger
The New York Post had a cover story titled, "Free-Dumb Tower" on Friday, April 18, 2008. In the article, they discussed how two sets of blueprints (actually, blueprints have been broadly replaced with plots and Digital prints for at least a decade now - but I guess we should not expect the Post to get that right either) for the planned Freedom Tower were discovered in a SoHo trash bin by some homeless guy. On that same day, there were numerous reports on the TV and radio where the reporter or DJ would sensationalize the dangers of how terrorists would just "drool" over such a stupid miss-hap.
Our newsletter, titled "LAD Sketch Pad" had an article about how the architect mistakenly posted security sensitive architectural drawings of the proposed embassy to built in Bagdad. This mistake, I can see would be a dumb act to follow. But having the drawings of the Freedom Tower found in a trash can does not press my buttons the same way.
After 9-11, the security of NYC has tightened but the access of drawings at the NYC Department of Buildings (DOB) still remains available to anyone with the proper identification. It is not clear if the DOB protects the sight of drawings such as this building of such publicity, but for most buildings in the city, all one needs to do is visit the NYC DOB's website to view all sorts of important data of any building in the city.
Some of these tid bits of information include: the certificate of occupancy that tells how many stories the building is, what uses are allowed on each floor, how many people can occupy each floor, what the maximum structural live load that is allowed on each floor, and the block/lot address location of the building. You can also find out what architect and/or engineer signed and sealed the drawings and forms that were filed at the DOB for each trade (plumbing, mechanical, general construction) of each building. Unfortunately, it is also very easy for a low paid draftsman at any of these architectural or engineering offices to back up computer drawings of the proposed building onto a portable thumb drive and then distribute it anyway that they see fit. So, finding the drawings in a trash can is the least of our troubles.
This latest story will profit the media and possibly the homeless man that found the drawings long before any terrorist attempts to have access to those misplaced papers.
Oh, by the way, if you are still going to be uneasy about terrorist having access to drawings of your home or office building. Then rest easy, many drawings of the existing buildings in NYC have somehow vanished in the past two or three decades. They are not anywhere to be found. The paper documents and the micorfilm copies of the drawings and forms are often of renovation projects within existing buildings. Since they are renovations and not proposed new buildings, the existing superstructure and other supporting trades are not shown in any accurate and dependable detail.
So, if someone with ill-will intensions tried to use these possibly inaccurate drawings, they might find themselves punching through your neighbor's walls with plumbing risers instead of through your apartment or office space.
Our newsletter, titled "LAD Sketch Pad" had an article about how the architect mistakenly posted security sensitive architectural drawings of the proposed embassy to built in Bagdad. This mistake, I can see would be a dumb act to follow. But having the drawings of the Freedom Tower found in a trash can does not press my buttons the same way.
After 9-11, the security of NYC has tightened but the access of drawings at the NYC Department of Buildings (DOB) still remains available to anyone with the proper identification. It is not clear if the DOB protects the sight of drawings such as this building of such publicity, but for most buildings in the city, all one needs to do is visit the NYC DOB's website to view all sorts of important data of any building in the city.
Some of these tid bits of information include: the certificate of occupancy that tells how many stories the building is, what uses are allowed on each floor, how many people can occupy each floor, what the maximum structural live load that is allowed on each floor, and the block/lot address location of the building. You can also find out what architect and/or engineer signed and sealed the drawings and forms that were filed at the DOB for each trade (plumbing, mechanical, general construction) of each building. Unfortunately, it is also very easy for a low paid draftsman at any of these architectural or engineering offices to back up computer drawings of the proposed building onto a portable thumb drive and then distribute it anyway that they see fit. So, finding the drawings in a trash can is the least of our troubles.
This latest story will profit the media and possibly the homeless man that found the drawings long before any terrorist attempts to have access to those misplaced papers.
Oh, by the way, if you are still going to be uneasy about terrorist having access to drawings of your home or office building. Then rest easy, many drawings of the existing buildings in NYC have somehow vanished in the past two or three decades. They are not anywhere to be found. The paper documents and the micorfilm copies of the drawings and forms are often of renovation projects within existing buildings. Since they are renovations and not proposed new buildings, the existing superstructure and other supporting trades are not shown in any accurate and dependable detail.
So, if someone with ill-will intensions tried to use these possibly inaccurate drawings, they might find themselves punching through your neighbor's walls with plumbing risers instead of through your apartment or office space.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)